Family Structure and Emotional Problems

via The Reformed Mind on a large-n study recently conducted:

Sullins, Donald Paul, Emotional Problems among Children with Same-Sex Parents: Difference by Definition (January 25, 2015). British Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science 7(2):99-120, 2015:

“Child emotional problems in opposite-sex
families are highest for single parent families and
lowest with married joint biological parents.
Compared to single parents, children with samesex
parents have less than twice the risk of
emotional problems (1.8 times), but they are at
almost four (3.6) times the risk of emotional
problems when compared to children residing
with married biological parents. However, risk
with same-sex parents is lowest relative to
opposite-sex single parent arrangements, not
cohabiting or step-parent families and after
adjusting for controls, is significantly higher
relative to any opposite-sex family form. Risk of
child emotional problems is 1.9-2.2 times greater,
significant at .01 or better, with same-sex parents
than with opposite-sex cohabiting parents or
step-parent family. Therefore, the hypothesis that
restrictions on parentage or married status
explain the higher risk of emotional problems in
same-sex families must be rejected.

The reduced risk of child emotional problems
with opposite-sex married parents compared to
same-sex parents is explained almost entirely by
the fact that married opposite-sex parents tend to
raise their own joint biological offspring, while
same-sex parents never do this. The primary
benefit of marriage for children, therefore, may
not be that it tends to present them with
improved parents (more stable, financially
affluent, etc., although it does do this), but that it
presents them with their own parents.

This is the case for all children with married joint
biological parents—which most successfully fulfill
the formal civil premise of marriage, which is
lifelong and exclusive partner commitment—
compared to less than half of children in any
other family category and no children in samesex
families. Whether or not same-sex families
attain the legal right, as opposite-sex couples
now have, to solemnize their relationship in civil
marriage, the two family forms will continue to
have fundamentally different, even contrasting,
effects on the biological component of child wellbeing,
to the relative detriment of children in
same-sex families. Functionally, opposite-sex
marriage is a social practice that, as much as
possible, ensures to children the joint care of
both biological parents, with the attendant
benefits that brings; same-sex marriage ensures
the opposite.”

Read more:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.